Case 1601650/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Hernandez v Greggs plc — 2019
- Case reference
- 1601650/2018
- Decision date
- 13 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Brace Members
- Venue
- Cardiff
- Panel members
- Mrs C Evans, Mr K Lannaman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Hernandez
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claimant's race discrimination claims under s.13 EqA 2010 and s.26(1) EqA 2010, finding that they were not well-founded.
The sexual harassment claim under s.26(2) EqA 2010 was dismissed because it was out of time and time was not extended. The claims under s.26(3) EqA 2010 and/or s.27 EqA 2010 were also dismissed as not well-founded.
The claimant's claim under s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996 for accrued untaken holiday pay was dismissed as not well-founded. No remedy was awarded in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that claims of race discrimination under s.13 EqA 2010 were not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The judgment groups s.26(1) EqA 2010 with the race discrimination claims and states they were not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The judgment states that the sexual harassment claim under s.26(2) EqA 2010 was out of time, time was not extended, and the claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment states that claims under both s.26(3) EqA 2010 and/or s.27 EqA 2010 were not well-founded and dismissed. The extracted text does not clearly identify the protected characteristic for the s.26(3) element. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claim under s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996 for accrued untaken holiday pay was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.13 EqA 2010
- s.26(1) EqA 2010
- s.26(2) EqA 2010
- s.26(3) EqA 2010
- s.27 EqA 2010
- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.