Case 1601787/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Murphy v Acas — 2020
- Case reference
- 1601787/2020
- Decision date
- 5 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharp Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Murphy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn the absence of an ET3 response form from ACAS, Employment Judge Sharp stated that there was sufficient material before the tribunal to make a proper determination and upheld the disability discrimination claim brought by Miss C Murphy. The judgment was made under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment expressly dealt with liability only. It stated that a preliminary hearing by telephone on 16 November 2020 would discuss how remedy could be addressed. No monetary award was recorded in the judgment sent to the parties on 5 November 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment in the absence of an ET3 response form from the respondent and upheld the disability discrimination claim. The judgment was on liability only; remedy was left to a preliminary hearing. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21, Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.