Case 1601865/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Withey v Nu-Tech Services Ltd t/a Nu-Tech Electrical — 2019
- Case reference
- 1601865/2018
- Decision date
- 9 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Cadney Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Withey
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Withey presented his claim form on 19 December 2018 after being dismissed on 22 June 2018. The tribunal said the ordinary limitation period expired on 21 September 2018, and that ACAS early conciliation on 21 September 2018 gave an automatic extension only until 21 October 2018. Because the claim was not served until 19 December 2018, the tribunal held that all of the claims were out of time.
The judge accepted the claimant's medical evidence showing ongoing moderate to severe anxiety and depression, and noted the medical record entry referring to an overdose when distressed. However, for the non-discrimination claims the tribunal applied the reasonable practicability test and found there was no evidence explaining why the claim was not brought in time. The judge also noted that the claimant had managed to discover and complete ACAS early conciliation within time, and had understood enough about the two-year service requirement for unfair dismissal to decide not to bring that claim originally.
For the discrimination claim, the tribunal applied the just and equitable test but refused to extend time. The claimant had not identified any protected characteristic in the claim form, and when asked at the hearing he was unable to identify one. The judge said the claim could not proceed on a general perception of unfairness and that allowing it to go forward without a central component of the claim would benefit nobody. All claims were therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The claimant ticked holiday pay and repeated a claim for unpaid holiday pay; the tribunal dismissed the claim as out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim form also ticked arrears of pay, other payments, and unlawful deduction from wages; the tribunal dismissed these claims as out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Harassment | The claimant alleged harassment and bullying in the workplace and referred to section 26 Equality Act 2010, but the tribunal dismissed the claim as out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The claimant also pursued a discrimination claim, but he could not identify any protected characteristic; the tribunal dismissed it as out of time and said it could not proceed on a general complaint of unfairness. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Box 10.1 was ticked for a whistleblowing claim; the tribunal dismissed it as out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judge assumed an automatic unfair dismissal claim based on whistleblowing under section 103A ERA 1996 and dismissed it as out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonable practicability test
- just and equitable test
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.