Case 1601989/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Williams v Cavali Investments Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1601989/2019
- Decision date
- 18 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs E Williams started work as a Food and Beverage Assistant at the Maes Manor Hotel on 7 June 2019. She brought claims for unpaid wages, holiday pay and notice pay. The tribunal preferred the evidence of Mr Yarnold and Ms Wellings on the events of 9 September 2019 and found that the claimant resigned during the telephone call rather than being dismissed. The judgment refers in places to 9 September 2020, but the surrounding correspondence and chronology are dated September 2019.
On the notice pay claim, the tribunal held that because Ms Williams resigned without notice she was not entitled to notice pay. On holiday pay, the tribunal accepted that she had already been paid holiday pay totalling £369.45 and found that, based on her contract and hours worked, she had accrued holiday worth £251.23 up to the date of resignation. It therefore concluded that no further holiday pay was due and that she had been overpaid on holiday pay rather than underpaid.
On wages, the tribunal found that the hours recorded on the claimant's signing-in sheets matched the hours paid on her payslips except for one entry on the July 2019 timesheet. That entry recorded that she was owed seven hours for 22 June 2019. The tribunal accepted that this was an outstanding underpayment and ordered the respondent to pay £57.47 gross in respect of those seven hours. Apart from that sum, it found that no other wages were due.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant had already been paid £369.45 holiday pay and had accrued holiday worth £251.23; no further holiday pay was due. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found one outstanding underpayment for seven hours worked on 22 June 2019 and ordered payment of £57.47 gross. Other alleged wage shortfalls were rejected. | Upheld | — | £57 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant resigned without notice on 9 September 2019, so no notice pay was due. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £57
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Section 13 ERA 1996
- Section 27 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.