Case 1602148/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Chen v Conwy County Borough Council — 2021
- Case reference
- 1602148/2020
- Decision date
- 14 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Chen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy case management orders of Employment Judge Brace dated 9 June 2021, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated concern was that the claimant did not appear to be entitled to bring a claim of unlawful deductions from wages under s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996, as referred to in the earlier case management orders dated 8 June 2021.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Struck out after the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, or request a hearing in response to the tribunal's case management orders. The orders stated that the claimant did not appear to be entitled to bring a claim of unlawful deductions from wages under s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.