Case 1602196/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B. Lokkason v Superbowl UK Newport Ltd HELD AT: Wrexham in chambers on written submissions only — 2020
- Case reference
- 1602196/2019
- Decision date
- 13 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B. Lokkason
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal was dealing with a case management decision on whether the claimant's Further and Better Particulars were simply clarifying existing claims or were applications to amend. It recorded that the respondent accepted the claimant lives with autism and that this amounts to a disability, and that the claimant had already been permitted to amend his case earlier to include automatic unfair constructive dismissal, unauthorised deduction from wages and breach of contract.
The tribunal refused permission to add new claims based on training in February 2019 and an internal recruitment exercise in April 2019. It also refused the attempt to add April 2019 internal recruitment allegations to the discrimination arising from disability claim, but accepted new public interest disclosure detriment allegations post-dating April 2019.
For the remaining discrimination allegations, the tribunal treated the Further and Better Particulars as clarification of existing claims for direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, indirect discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments and harassment related to disability, and granted amendment where the particulars went beyond the original ET1. The tribunal said any time limit questions, and any point about whether events could be relied on for the dismissal claim, would be decided at the final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Amendment accepted for new public interest disclosure detriment allegations post-dating April 2019 (F&BPs paras 7(d)-r); the broader attempt to add training-related allegations from February 2019 was refused. | Other | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination particulars were accepted and treated as amendment where needed (F&BPs paras 14(c)-j). | Other | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability particulars were accepted and treated as amendment where needed (F&BPs paras 16-19); the attempt to add April 2019 internal recruitment allegations was refused. | Other | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Indirect discrimination particulars were clarified and, where necessary, amendment was granted (F&BPs paras 20-23). | Other | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments particulars were clarified and, where necessary, amendment was granted (F&BPs paras 24-28). | Other | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to disability particulars were clarified and, where necessary, amendment was granted (F&BPs paras 29-31). | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.