Case 1602346/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Moroney v Betsi Cadwaladr University Local Health Board — 2024
- Case reference
- 1602346/2023
- Decision date
- 24 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- By Video
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Moroney
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by video on 16 April 2024 before Employment Judge R F Powell. The written record is dated 18 April 2024 and sent to the parties on 24 April 2024. It states that reasons for the decision were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons were not provided with the judgment.
The tribunal dismissed the pregnancy and maternity discrimination claim because it had not been presented in time and it was not just and equitable to extend time. It also dismissed the unfair dismissal claim because it was not presented by a time when it was reasonable to have done so.
The tribunal held that it was just and equitable to extend time for the disability discrimination claims relating to the respondent's dismissal and appeal procedure, as identified in paragraphs 38 to 40 of the claimant's witness statement dated 25 March 2024. The written judgment does not record any merits determination on those disability discrimination claims and records no remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Dismissed because the claim was not presented in time and the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claim was not presented by a time when it was reasonable to have done so. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal held that it was just and equitable to extend time for the disability discrimination claims relating to the respondent's dismissal and appeal procedure identified in paragraphs 38 to 40 of the claimant's witness statement. The written judgment does not record a merits decision on those claims. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- just and equitable to extend time
- reasonable time for presentation
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.