Case 1602478/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Langerveld v Powys County Council and 2 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 1602478/2020
- Decision date
- 27 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins
- Venue
- Aberystwyth
- Panel members
- Mrs J Beard, Mr A Fryer
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr A Langerveld
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Aberystwyth before Employment Judge S Jenkins with Mrs J Beard and Mr A Fryer. The claimant, Mr A Langerveld, appeared in person and the respondents were represented by counsel. The judgment records that the claimant's claims of harassment related to sex, harassment related to religion or belief, and victimisation all failed and were dismissed.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. No separate remedy findings or monetary award are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | Harassment related to sex. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to religion or belief. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.