Case 1602509/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Manneh First v UNISON Second Respondent: Aneurin Bevan University Health Board — 2025
- Case reference
- 1602509/2024
- Decision date
- 22 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Evans Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Manneh First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 22 April 2025 in Cardiff via the Cloud Video Platform before Employment Judge R Evans, the claimant was granted permission to withdraw his complaint of direct discrimination against UNISON arising from an email sent on 19 August 2020. The judgment records that this complaint was withdrawn on the claimant's application.
On the First Respondent's application dated 16 January 2025, the claimant's complaints of direct discrimination and harassment against UNISON, identified at paras 2.2 and 2.3 of the list of issues, were struck out in their entirety. The effect of the order was to discharge the First Respondent as a party to the proceedings.
The short judgment does not record any substantive merits findings or any monetary award. It states that written reasons were sought and would follow at a later date.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Withdrawn on the claimant's application on 22 April 2025. The short judgment identifies this as a complaint of direct discrimination arising from an email sent on 19 August 2020; race is treated as the protected characteristic from the case listing/context, although the reasons text does not repeat it. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | Struck out on the First Respondent's application dated 16 January 2025, together with the harassment complaint at para 2.3. The short judgment identifies this as a direct discrimination complaint but does not set out the underlying facts. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Harassment | Struck out in the same order as the direct discrimination complaint at para 2.2, on the First Respondent's application dated 16 January 2025. The extracted reasons text does not provide the factual detail of the allegation. | Struck out | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the .
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.