Case 1602958/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Luke MacDonald v Superdrug Stores plc — 2026
- Case reference
- 1602958/2025
- Decision date
- 30 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leith Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Luke MacDonald
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal's written judgment records that the claimant's complaints of harassment, victimisation and unauthorised deduction from wages failed and were dismissed.
The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing. No written reasons or remedy findings appear in the extracted text, and no monetary award was made on the face of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The judgment records that the harassment complaint failed and was dismissed. No written reasons were provided in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment records that the victimisation complaint failed and was dismissed. No written reasons were provided in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the unauthorised deduction from wages complaint failed and was dismissed. No written reasons were provided in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.