Case 1603107/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T Platts v John Lewis plc — 2024
- Case reference
- 1603107/2023
- Decision date
- 12 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp
- Venue
- Cardiff
- Panel members
- Ms K Smith, Ms R Hartwell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs T Platts
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal sitting at Cardiff by CVP on 11 September 2024, before Employment Judge C Sharp with Ms K Smith and Ms R Hartwell, gave a unanimous judgment dismissing all claims brought by Mrs T Platts against John Lewis PLC. The written record states that the tribunal gave its reasons orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's failure to make reasonable adjustments claim and her discrimination arising from disability claim. It also dismissed her unfair dismissal claim, each being recorded as not well founded. No monetary award is recorded in the written judgment, and no separate remedy findings are set out in the document.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments claim; dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability claim; dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed as not well founded. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons are provided unless requested. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.