Case 1800015/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Mbuisa v Isand Limited and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 1800015/2021
- Decision date
- 1 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Evans
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr L Mbuisa
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined the claimant's employment status as a preliminary issue. It held that the claimant was not an employee for the purposes of section 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, but was a worker for the purposes of that section.
Because the claimant was not an employee, the tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal claims. For the same reason, it also struck out the breach of contract claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the tribunal found the claimant was not an employee for the purposes of section 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Struck out because the tribunal found the claimant was not an employee for the purposes of section 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.230 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.