Case 1800050/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Salah Sherif v Telecom Services Centres t/a Webhelp UK and 3 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 1800050/2024
- Decision date
- 6 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Drake Signed
Parties
5 namedClaimant
Mr Salah Sherif
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a private preliminary hearing by video link, the claimant clarified his claims through his representative. He accepted on advice that he could not pursue claims against the second, third and fourth respondents, and those claims were dismissed on withdrawal.
The tribunal also dismissed on withdrawal the claimant's TUPE claims under Regulations 13 and 14 and his claim of automatically unfair dismissal under Section 104(4)(e) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment records that only the first respondent would remain in the action and that other complaints listed in case management orders would continue; those remaining complaints were not determined in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | Claims under Regulations 13 and 14 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 were dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The claim of automatically unfair dismissal under Section 104(4)(e) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Regulations 13 and 14 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006
- Section 104(4)(e) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.