Case 1800066/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Bredin v Canon UK Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1800066/2019
- Decision date
- 22 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Keevash Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Bredin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Leeds on 21 May 2019, before Employment Judge Keevash, the tribunal made a procedural order rather than determining the merits. It adjourned the proceedings to 2 July 2019 and recorded that the claim would then be automatically dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant unless either party notified the tribunal to the contrary.
The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the decision. No findings on liability, breach, deduction, or remedy are recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment itself records only a procedural adjournment and states that the claim will be treated as automatically dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant unless either party notifies the tribunal to the contrary. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment itself records only a procedural adjournment and states that the claim will be treated as automatically dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant unless either party notifies the tribunal to the contrary. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.