Case 1800086/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Brierley v Shine Bright Day Care & Out of School Club Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1800086/2023
- Decision date
- 5 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wilkinson Representation
- Venue
- The Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Brierley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a consent judgment under rule 64 issued by Employment Judge Wilkinson at The Leeds Employment Tribunal, heard remotely by CVP on 5 April 2023. The claimant was represented by Mr Townend and the respondent by Mr Haines. The written record orders the respondent to pay Miss C Brierley gross wages of £1,733.30 for October 2022 and £864.88 for November 2022, both on or before 22 May 2023.
The judgment also orders the respondent to pay outstanding holiday pay for 58.2 hours at £582.00 gross, also by 22 May 2023. The total sum recorded by the orders is £3,180.18 gross.
The judgment does not contain contested findings of fact, reasoning, or any named legal tests; it records only the consent terms and the payment deadlines.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Consent judgment under rule 64. The order covers wages for October 2022 (£1,733.30 gross) and November 2022 (£864.88 gross), payable on or before 22 May 2023. | Settled | — | £2,598 |
| Holiday pay | Consent judgment under rule 64. The order covers outstanding holiday pay for 58.2 hours at £582.00 gross, payable on or before 22 May 2023. | Settled | — | £582 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,180
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.