Case 1800163/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Ibeziako For the First v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 1800163/2019
- Decision date
- 24 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Knowles Appearances
- Venue
- Hull
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr M Ibeziako For the First
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim form presented on 20 December 2018 alleged sex and race discrimination, harassment and victimisation under the Equality Act 2010. At the preliminary hearing on 1 July 2019, the issue was whether the parties had reached a binding settlement through ACAS before the hearing. The tribunal recorded that the claimants had been given further time to prepare evidence and submissions on that point.
The tribunal found that the claimants had first made an offer to withdraw the claims on the basis that all parties would bear their own costs, and that this counter-offer was repeated through ACAS on 27 March 2019, 3 April 2019 and 11 April 2019. The respondents then accepted that wording without caveat on 17 April 2019. The later exchanges, including revisions sent through ACAS after that date, were held not to affect the concluded agreement.
Applying section 144 and section 120 of the Equality Act 2010, and relying on Gilbert v Kembridge Fibres and Allma Construction Ltd v Bonner, the tribunal concluded that a legally binding ACAS-assisted settlement had been reached on 17 April 2019. It held that the agreement covered withdrawal of the claims and each party bearing its own costs. Because the settlement had been reached with the assistance of a conciliation officer, the tribunal held that it no longer had jurisdiction to hear the claims.
The claims were therefore dismissed. No separate monetary award was made, because the tribunal did not determine the discrimination, harassment or victimisation allegations on their merits and dealt only with the jurisdictional effect of the settlement.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Dismissed because the tribunal found a binding ACAS-assisted settlement had been reached on 17 April 2019, so it no longer had jurisdiction to hear the claim. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | Dismissed because the tribunal found a binding ACAS-assisted settlement had been reached on 17 April 2019, so it no longer had jurisdiction to hear the claim. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Dismissed because the tribunal found a binding ACAS-assisted settlement had been reached on 17 April 2019, so it no longer had jurisdiction to hear the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Victimisation | Dismissed because the tribunal found a binding ACAS-assisted settlement had been reached on 17 April 2019, so it no longer had jurisdiction to hear the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 144 Equality Act 2010
- section 120 Equality Act 2010
- Gilbert v Kembridge Fibres
- Allma Construction Ltd v Bonner
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.