Case 1800201/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Rumford Mrs S Rumford v City of York Council — 2023
- Case reference
- 1800201/2023
- Decision date
- 4 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Rumford Mrs S Rumford
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr and Mrs Rumford retired from City of York Council on 30 September 2022. The tribunal found that the Council had historically paid back pay to leavers on request when national local government pay awards were agreed after the relevant backdated effective date, and that this practice had continued for many years. A corporate management team decision on 16 March 2022 changed the approach for the 2021 award and future awards, but the tribunal found that the change had not been directly communicated to the claimants before they retired.
The tribunal held that the claimants' contracts provided for salary to be reviewed in accordance with the NJC national pay bargaining arrangements, and that the November 2022 agreement increasing pay rates from 1 April 2022 applied to work done while both claimants were still employed. Applying s.13 and s.27 ERA 1996, and relying on Robertson v Blackstone Franks Investment Management Ltd, the tribunal concluded that the later payment date did not stop the sums from being wages properly payable in connection with their employment.
In the alternative, the tribunal found an implied contractual term arising from custom and practice that arrears of backdated pay would be paid to employees who had left before agreement if they requested payment. Applying the Park Cakes v Shumba approach, it relied on the long-standing practice, the shared understanding within HR and among employees, and the absence of any prior exercise of discretion to pay leavers. The tribunal therefore found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered City of York Council to pay Mr Rumford £577.50 gross and Mrs Rumford £641.66 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mr Rumford's unlawful deduction from wages claim succeeded; the tribunal ordered payment of £577.50 gross. | Upheld | — | £578 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mrs Rumford's unlawful deduction from wages claim succeeded; the tribunal ordered payment of £641.66 gross. | Upheld | — | £642 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,219
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.27 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Robertson v Blackstone Franks Investment Management Ltd
- Park Cakes Ltd v Shumba and others
- custom and practice implied term
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.