Case 1800248/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Firth v Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust — 2021
- Case reference
- 1800248/2021
- Decision date
- 9 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller
- Panel members
- Ms H Brown, Mr L Priestley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Firth
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr A Firth’s claims against Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust were brought under the Equality Act 2010 and were all unsuccessful. The tribunal dismissed claims of discrimination arising from disability under s 15, indirect disability discrimination under s 19, failure to make reasonable adjustments under ss 20 and 21, and harassment related to disability under s 26.
The written record does not set out the tribunal’s factual findings or legal reasoning. It notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. On the face of the published decision, the only recorded outcome is dismissal of each disability-related claim.
No remedy, compensation, or other monetary award is recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim under s 15 Equality Act 2010 (discrimination arising from disability), dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim under s 19 Equality Act 2010 (indirect disability discrimination), dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim under ss 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010 (failure to make reasonable adjustments), dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Claim under s 26 Equality Act 2010 (harassment related to disability), dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.15 Equality Act 2010
- s.19 Equality Act 2010
- ss.20 and 21 Equality Act 2010
- s.26 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.