Case 1800254/2015 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Burland Mr M Duffy Mr J Gildea Mr P Johnson Mr M Kirtley Mr J Moore Mr A Tuck Mr N Dunmow v R1) HTC Plant Limited R2) HTC Wolffkran Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1800254/2015
- Decision date
- 5 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Little Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Burland Mr M Duffy Mr J Gildea Mr P Johnson Mr M Kirtley Mr J Moore Mr A Tuck Mr N Dunmow
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 4 February 2020 the tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing explaining why the claims should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the claimants had not replied to the tribunal's letter of 22 January 2020 and that the claims had not been actively pursued.
The claimants did not make any written representations and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge Little Date therefore held that the claims should be struck out under rule 37. No merits findings were made and no monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that 'the claims' were struck out under rule 37 after the claimants failed to respond or request a hearing. The underlying claim type is not identified in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.