Case 1800288/2015 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Tuck v R1) HTC Plant Limited R2) HTC Wolffkran Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1800288/2015
- Decision date
- 17 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Little
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Tuck
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike-out judgment under rule 37 in which Employment Judge Little recorded that the Tribunal had sent a letter dated 6 March 2020 giving the claimant an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The extracted text does not record any substantive merits findings or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment is a strike-out decision under rule 37 and does not specify the underlying substantive claim type in the extracted text. The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.