Case 1800563/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Kilmartin v Sheirs Solicitors Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1800563/2019
- Decision date
- 20 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Mr T Downes, Mr M Taj
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms T Kilmartin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leeds from 16 to 20 September 2019 before Employment Judge JM Wade, with Mr T Downes and Mr M Taj sitting as the tribunal members. The tribunal rejected the constructive unfair dismissal claim and dismissed the first section 15 disability discrimination complaint about a missed recovery of vehicle damage payment in December 2017, which it said failed for reasons of limitation. It also dismissed the disability-related harassment, section 15 discrimination and victimisation complaints linked to alleged daily harassment over discrepancies with Access to Work taxi claims.
The tribunal rejected the claims about failures to make reasonable adjustments, including the complaints based on pay deducted due to sick leave, clawback, and adjusted finish times. It also dismissed the direct discrimination claims concerning pay deducted for time off, including the race, religious belief and sex complaints, and dismissed the religious belief complaint about refusal of paid time off on Christmas Eve and Maundy Thursday.
On the allegation that the claimant was forced to negotiate an early finish time on 25 September 2018, the tribunal rejected the race discrimination complaint but upheld the sex discrimination complaint. It further dismissed the harassment complaints related to race and/or religion arising from colleague ZB's conduct on 12 October 2018 and from the alleged incitement of a colleague to present a grievance. The extracted judgment does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
18 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Constructive unfair dismissal claim; not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Section 15 disability discrimination concerning a missed recovery of vehicle damage payment in December 2017; dismissed for limitation. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Disability-related harassment concerning discrepancies with Access to Work taxi claims; described by the tribunal as daily harassment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Section 15 disability discrimination concerning discrepancies with Access to Work taxi claims; dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation concerning discrepancies with Access to Work taxi claims; dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments based on pay deducted due to sick leave; dismissed. | Dismissed |
Legal tests applied
7 references- constructive unfair dismissal
- Section 15 disability discrimination
- reasonable adjustments
- direct discrimination
- harassment
- victimisation
- limitation
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.