Case 1800566/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Bradley (scottish advocate/counsel) For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 1800566/2019
- Decision date
- 11 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Venue
- Sheffield
- Panel members
- Mr M Firkin, Mr T Fox
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr R Bradley (scottish advocate/counsel) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Sheffield, before Employment Judge JM Wade sitting with Mr M Firkin and Mr T Fox, determined two claims brought by Ms J Prewett against Green King Services Limited. The tribunal held that the claimant's complaint of sexual harassment succeeded, and that her complaint of unfair dismissal failed.
The judgment records that, by consent, the respondent was to pay the claimant £5,000 within 28 days, by 9 July 2019. The extracted text does not break that sum down between heads of loss or between the individual claims, and it does not contain further reasons for the merits findings beyond the stated outcomes.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The judgment states that the claimant's complaint of sexual harassment succeeds. The £5,000 payment ordered by consent is not apportioned between the claims in the extracted text. | Upheld | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.