Case 1800653/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Hemingway v Ford Retail Limited T/A TrustFord — 2020
- Case reference
- 1800653/2020
- Decision date
- 18 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Hemingway
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Mr G Hemingway’s unfair dismissal claim had been made subject to a £20 deposit order following a preliminary hearing on 10 June 2020, and that the order was sent to him on 12 June 2020. As the deposit was not paid, the tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
Because the claim was struck out for non-payment of the deposit, the hearing listed for 23 October 2020 would not proceed. No remedy was awarded and no separate liability findings on the merits of the dismissal claim were made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant was ordered to pay a deposit of £20.00 after a preliminary hearing on 10 June 2020, but failed to pay it. The complaint of unfair dismissal was struck out under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.