Case 1800658/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Devenish-Meares v Jet2.com Limited AT A HEARING — 2023
- Case reference
- 1800658/2022
- Decision date
- 2 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Members
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- R Webb, J Noble
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Devenish-Meares
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mrs D Devenish-Meares was unfairly dismissed. It also found that she was less favourably treated on the ground that she was a part-time worker. Those findings were recorded in the judgment dated 2 November 2023 after the hearing in Leeds over 30 and 31 October and 1 and 2 November 2023.
The tribunal dismissed the claims that the claimant was discriminated against because of her age or because of her sex. No separate remedy figure was set out in this judgment for any claim.
Remedy was adjourned part-heard to a date to be fixed if not agreed. The judgment therefore records liability findings but does not record the final award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Liability was found, but remedy was adjourned part-heard to a later date if not agreed. | Upheld | — | — |
| Part-time worker regulations | The tribunal found the claimant was less favourably treated because she was a part-time worker. | Upheld | — | — |
| Age discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Sex discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.