Case 1800832/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R Zakaszewska v Cranswick Convenience Foods plc — 2022
- Case reference
- 1800832/2021
- Decision date
- 12 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller
- Venue
- Hull
- Panel members
- Mr K Lannaman, Mr M Weller
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms R Zakaszewska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Hull, sitting before Employment Judge Miller with Mr K Lannaman and Mr M Weller, dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal claim. The judgment records that the unfair dismissal claim was not well founded and was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the dismissal was in breach of contract and held that the claimant was entitled to one month's notice pay. The amount payable was to be agreed between the parties or, failing agreement, determined at a further hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The tribunal dismissed the claimant's claim of direct race discrimination. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal dismissed the claimant's claim under section 15 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The tribunal dismissed the claimant's harassment claim relating to race. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Harassment | The tribunal dismissed the claimant's harassment claim relating to disability. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.