Case 1800891/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Khan v Department of Work and Pensions — 2023
- Case reference
- 1800891/2023
- Decision date
- 20 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Mr D Eales, Mr P Kent
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Khan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the complaint of unfair dismissal, finding that it was not well-founded.
The tribunal also dismissed the disability-related harassment complaint as not well-founded. The complaint concerning failure to make reasonable adjustments in relation to leave in November and December 2021 was dismissed as out of time, with the tribunal deciding that it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit.
The remaining complaints of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability were dismissed because they were not well-founded. No remedy was awarded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint of unfair dismissal was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Harassment | The complaint of harassment related to disability was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments in relation to leave in November and December 2021 was dismissed because it was not presented within the applicable time limit and the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time. The remaining reasonable adjustments complaints were found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.