Case 1801077/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Wilkinson v Harrogate & District Travel Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1801077/2021
- Decision date
- 16 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bright
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Mr M Lewis, Ms J Noble
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Wilkinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Leeds, before Employment Judge Bright with Mr M Lewis and Ms J Noble, dealt with claims by Mr M Wilkinson against Harrogate and District Travel Limited. The judgment records that the complaints of age discrimination and age-related harassment were not well founded and were dismissed.
The tribunal also found that the complaint of automatically unfair dismissal for whistleblowing was not well founded and was dismissed. No monetary remedy is recorded in the judgment.
The complaint of a failure to pay holiday pay was not determined on the merits because it was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Harassment | Age-related harassment was found not well founded. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Whistleblowing | The complaint of automatically unfair dismissal for whistleblowing was found not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The complaint of failure to pay holiday pay was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.