Case 1801082/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Chaudhry v Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1801082/2020
- Decision date
- 4 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Chaudhry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 52 judgment on withdrawal dated 4 May 2020, sent by Employment Judge JM Wade. The claimant, Mr M Chaudhry, brought complaints recorded in the extracted text as direct discrimination and harassment against Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Plc.
The judgment states that those complaints were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. No substantive findings on liability are set out in the extracted text, and no remedy was awarded.
The extracted text does not identify the protected characteristic said to underlie the direct discrimination or harassment complaints, and it does not record any legal test, hearing panel, or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment records a complaint of direct discrimination, but it does not specify the protected characteristic in the text provided. The complaint was dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Harassment | Dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal. The extracted text does not identify any protected characteristic for the harassment complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.