Case 1801284/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Wylie v Bidvest Noonan (UK) Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1801284/2022
- Decision date
- 1 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Wylie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was a partial judgment on withdrawal under rule 52. All claims against Stephen Hodson and Liam Kearney were dismissed on withdrawal, while the claims continued against Bidvest Noonan (UK) Limited.
The claimant withdrew parts of her direct sex and marriage discrimination claims relating to two specified acts: a comment said to have been made by Stephen Hodson on 26 November 2021 and the respondent's alleged failure on 24 February 2022 to arrange shifts so that the claimant did not have to work alongside her husband. The remainder of the direct sex and marriage discrimination claim was to proceed to a final hearing.
The claimant also withdrew parts of her harassment claim related to sex and marriage discrimination, concerning three specified matters. The remainder of the harassment claim, and the remaining claims, were to proceed to a final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment dismisses on withdrawal the claimant's direct sex discrimination claim only in so far as it arises from the specified acts on 26 November 2021 and 24 February 2022. The remainder of the direct sex discrimination claim was to proceed to a final hearing. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Marriage or civil partnership discrimination | The judgment dismisses on withdrawal the claimant's direct marriage discrimination claim only in so far as it arises from the specified acts on 26 November 2021 and 24 February 2022. The remainder of the direct marriage discrimination claim was to proceed to a final hearing. | Withdrawn | Marriage / civil partnership | — |
| Harassment | The judgment dismisses on withdrawal the claimant's harassment claim related to sex only in so far as it arises from the specified acts. The remainder of the harassment claim was to proceed to a final hearing. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Harassment | The judgment dismisses on withdrawal the claimant's harassment claim related to marriage discrimination only in so far as it arises from the specified acts. The remainder of the harassment claim was to proceed to a final hearing. | Withdrawn | Marriage / civil partnership | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.