Case 1801473/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Mitchell v Doing More Print Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1801473/2024
- Decision date
- 2 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bright ORDERS
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Mitchell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claims were issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 2 March 2024 and 3 March 2024. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claims under rule 21. The judge also removed DM Print Limited (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) from the proceedings under rule 34 and was satisfied, on the basis of the payslips and other evidence, that Doing More Print Limited was the claimant's former employer and the correct respondent.
On the substance of the claims, Employment Judge Bright found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £605.48 gross. The judge also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £7,265.76. In addition, the tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £16,045.22.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £605.48 gross. The total monetary award reflected the four sums ordered in the judgment, amounting to £24,521.94.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £605.48. | Upheld | — | £605 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £7,265.76. | Upheld | — | £7,266 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £16,045.22. | Upheld | — | £16,045 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £605.48. | Upheld | — | £605 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £24,522
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.