Case 1801585/2018 · Employment Tribunal
1. Mr I Marshall 2. Mr I Miah 3. Mr M Tarver v IBM (United Kingdom) Ltd and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 1801585/2018
- Decision date
- 2 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robertson
Parties
3 namedClaimant
1. Mr I Marshall 2. Mr I Miah 3. Mr M Tarver
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal had ordered the claimants at a preliminary hearing on 21 October 2019 to explain by 4 November 2019 why they had failed to attend the hearing and to confirm whether they were pursuing their claims. The order warned that non-compliance could lead to the claims being struck out without further notice or hearing.
The claimants did not comply with that order. The Tribunal found there was no evidence that they were pursuing their claims and struck out the claims on the ground that they were not actively pursuing them.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not set out the substantive claim details; classification follows the supplied listing category of Working Time Regulations. The judgment states only that the claims were struck out because the claimants were not actively pursuing them. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.