Case 1801749/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Gary Aspin v British Red Cross and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 1801749/2019
- Decision date
- 15 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Eeley
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr Gary Aspin
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the Second Respondent, British Red Cross Society, was the Claimant’s employer and that the First Respondent, British Red Cross, was merely a trading name. On that basis the First Respondent was removed from the proceedings.
The Claimant’s constructive unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. The judgment does not set out further findings or a monetary award.
The Respondent’s application for costs against the Claimant also failed and was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes the claim as 'constructive unfair dismissal' and dismisses it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.