Case 1801892/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Allen v The Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police — 2023
- Case reference
- 1801892/2022
- Decision date
- 3 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Mr M Brewer, Mr R Stead
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Allen
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant withdrew her complaints of disability-related harassment and victimisation so far as they related to an alleged failure to sign her Personal Development Report. Those complaints were therefore dismissed on withdrawal.
The tribunal dismissed all remaining complaints as not well-founded. The dismissed complaints were disability-related harassment, unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability, victimisation, and unfair and discriminatory constructive dismissal.
The judgment provided is a short liability judgment or record of outcome only. It states the tribunal's conclusions but does not set out detailed factual findings or legal reasoning beyond those disposals.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | Complaint of disability-related harassment in relation to failure to sign the Personal Development Report was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Complaint of victimisation in relation to failure to sign the Personal Development Report was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Harassment | All remaining disability-related harassment complaints were dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability was dismissed as not well-founded. The reference to 'discriminatory constructive dismissal' indicates a disability discrimination dismissal complaint, but the short judgment does not specify the precise statutory label. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | All remaining victimisation complaints were dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.