Case 1802036/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1802036/2020
- Decision date
- 1 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Panel members
- Mr W Roberts, Mr K Smith
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal unanimously upheld allegation 18.2.8, finding that harassment related to disability was made out. It also upheld allegation 18.2.5, finding that the just and equitable period for bringing that allegation extended to 11 April 2020, when it was presented, and that this allegation therefore succeeded as well.
The tribunal recorded that the respondent had contravened the Equality Act as found above. In all other respects, the claimant's claims were dismissed. No separate monetary remedy was recorded in the judgment text provided.
The hearing was before Employment Judge JM Wade, with Mr W Roberts and Mr K Smith. The claimant was in person and the respondent was represented by Ms A Del Priore, counsel.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | Allegation 18.2.8: harassment related to disability. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Allegation 18.2.5: harassment related to disability; the tribunal held the just and equitable period for bringing it extended to 11 April 2020, when it was made. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable period
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.