Case 1802071/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Netsereab v ARLA Foods UK plc — 2022
- Case reference
- 1802071/2022
- Decision date
- 1 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Netsereab
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 11 June 2022, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the complaint of pregnancy and maternity discrimination should not be struck out on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the pregnancy and maternity discrimination complaint. The decision records that the claimant's remaining claim(s) remained listed for hearing on 6 July 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The tribunal struck out the complaint of pregnancy and maternity discrimination because the claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, in response to the Tribunal's 11 June 2022 letter inviting submissions or a request for a hearing on whether the claim had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.