Case 1802162/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Campbell v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 1802162/2021
- Decision date
- 9 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Members
- Venue
- Sheffield
- Panel members
- Ms J Hiser, Mr K Lannaman
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr J Campbell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed the harassment claim against the Second Respondent. It was not satisfied that the comment at issue was done in the course of the Second Respondent's employment with the First Respondent.
The Tribunal also dismissed the claim of harassment related to race and direct race discrimination by Mrs Robson. The written judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested by a party within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The judgment dismisses the harassment claim against the Second Respondent because the Tribunal was not satisfied that the comment at issue was done in the course of his employment with the First Respondent. The short written judgment does not set out the comment or detailed reasoning. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The judgment states that the claim of harassment related to race by Mrs Robson fails and is dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claim of direct race discrimination by Mrs Robson fails and is dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.