Case 1802178/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M F Khan v Caversham Finance (trading As Brighthouse) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1802178/2020
- Decision date
- 15 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M F Khan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 29 April 2021, the tribunal stayed the claim to allow the claimant an opportunity to apply for the consent of the administrators to proceed. On 4 October 2021, the claimant was asked for an update by 18 October 2021.
By letter dated 19 October 2021, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order of 4 October 2021 and because the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing.
Employment Judge Lancaster therefore struck out the claim on 15 November 2021. The judgment records no merits findings and no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment struck out the claim as a whole after the claimant failed to comply with an order and did not actively pursue the case; no separate merits determination is given for this head. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | Included as the protective award head from the case listing; the judgment struck out the claim as a whole and does not give a separate merits determination for this head. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment struck out the claim as a whole after the claimant failed to make sufficient representations or request a hearing; no separate merits determination is given for this head. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment struck out the claim as a whole after the claimant failed to make sufficient representations or request a hearing; no separate merits determination is given for this head. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.