Case 1802196/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Alliance Healthcare Management Services Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1802196/2020
- Decision date
- 8 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones Date
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Mr B Roberts, Mr G Corbett
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claimant was not a disabled person during his employment. On that basis, the disability discrimination claims were dismissed. The tribunal also dismissed the claim for harassment related to race, the direct race discrimination claim, and the victimisation claims.
The tribunal found the public interest disclosure detriment claims were well founded only in part. It upheld those claims in relation to the claimant having been suspended, subjected to retaliatory action, and accused of insubordination and rudeness to management, and dismissed them in all other respects.
For those upheld detriments, the tribunal awarded the claimant £10,000 for injury to feelings, inclusive of aggravated damages, together with £933 interest.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal held that the claimant was not a disabled person during his employment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to race was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | The direct race discrimination claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment states that the victimisation claims were dismissed, but does not specify the protected characteristic in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The detriment claims for having made public interest disclosures succeeded only in respect of suspension, retaliatory action, and accusations of insubordination and rudeness to management; they were otherwise dismissed. The award was £10,000 for injury to feelings inclusive of aggravated damages, plus £933 interest. | Upheld | — | £10,933 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,933
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.