Case 1802232/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Jasmine Fuller v Mr. D and Mrs L Smith t/a Preceptory Lodge — 2020
- Case reference
- 1802232/2020
- Decision date
- 13 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Mr. A Senior, Mr. M Firkin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Jasmine Fuller
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Leeds by CVP on 11, 12 and 13 November 2020 before Employment Judge Buckley with lay members Mr. A Senior and Mr. M Firkin, dismissed all of the claimant's claims against Mr. D and Mrs L Smith t/a Preceptory Lodge. The claim for unfair dismissal was dismissed.
The tribunal also dismissed the claim for harassment related to disability and the claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment extract, and no separate remedy figures are set out for any claim.
The extracted judgment text contains only the formal dispositive orders and does not set out the tribunal's detailed reasons or findings of fact. The public record therefore supports the outcomes listed above, but no further reasoning can be reliably extracted from the supplied text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Harassment | Claim described as harassment related to disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.