Case 1802583/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Sykes v Aviva Employment Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1802583/2022
- Decision date
- 5 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Evans
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Sykes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary judgment heard by Employment Judge Evans sitting alone at Leeds by CVP on 5 December 2022. No merits findings were made on the substantive breach of contract or age discrimination allegations. The decision was confined to limitation issues and the tribunal recorded that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
On the breach of contract claim, the tribunal held that it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to present the claim within three months less one day of the effective date of termination. It further held that the claimant presented the claim within a reasonable further period, so the breach of contract claim was not out of time.
On the age discrimination claim, the tribunal held that if any act of age discrimination took place on 26 November 2021, it would be just and equitable to extend time, so the claim would not be out of time. The tribunal also recorded an agreed approach that if the relevant act took place earlier than 26 November 2021, the respondent could argue that the claim was presented outside the primary time limit because there was no continuing act, and could also argue that it would not be just and equitable to extend time. That issue was left to be decided separately.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Preliminary ruling on time limit only. The tribunal held the breach of contract claim was not out of time because it was not reasonably practicable to present it within three months less one day of the effective date of termination and it was presented within a reasonable further period. | Other | — | — |
| Age discrimination | Preliminary ruling on time limit only. The tribunal held that if any act of age discrimination took place on 26 November 2021, it would be just and equitable to extend time, so the claim was not out of time on that basis. The tribunal noted that if the relevant act took place earlier, the respondent could argue both primary limitation and that it would not be just and equitable to extend time, which remained to be decided. | Other | Age | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- not reasonably practicable
- reasonable further period
- just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.