Case 1802684/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Dobson v Transunion Information Group Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1802684/2020
- Decision date
- 30 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Dobson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Miss C Dobson brought proceedings against Transunion Information Group Limited. It does not set out any findings on the substance of the claim, and instead states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.
No remedy was awarded and no merits determination is recorded in the extracted text. The judgment is dated 4 September 2020 and was sent to the parties on 30 September 2020.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The underlying cause of action is taken from the gov.uk listing context. | Withdrawn | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The underlying cause of action is taken from the gov.uk listing context. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The underlying cause of action is taken from the gov.uk listing context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.