Case 1802857/2020 · Employment Tribunal

Mrs S Mogane v Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and 1 other — 2021

Case reference: 1802857/2020
Decision date: 25 January 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Lancaster Members
Venue: Leeds
Panel members: Ms S Norburn, Mr R Webb

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

3 named

Claimant

Mrs S Mogane

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal found that Mrs S Mogane was dismissed by reason of redundancy. It ordered Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust to pay her a contractual redundancy payment of £19,045.88.

The written judgment states that all other claims were dismissed. The record provided does not list those dismissed claims separately or set out any additional remedy components beyond the contractual redundancy payment.

The hearing took place at Leeds on 18, 19, 20, 21 and 25 January 2021 before Employment Judge Lancaster with lay members Ms S Norburn and Mr R Webb. Reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons were not provided unless requested within 14 days.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Redundancy	The tribunal ordered the First Respondent to pay a contractual redundancy payment of £19,045.88. The judgment also states that all other claims were dismissed, but it does not identify those claims individually in the written record.	Upheld	—	£19,046

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £19,046; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.