Case 1802932/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Shaheen v LPS Solicitors Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 1802932/2024
- Decision date
- 22 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Singh
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Ms G Fleming, Mr W Roberts
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Shaheen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant, Miss A Shaheen, had been employed by LPS Solicitors Ltd from December 2013 until January 2024. She brought complaints of unfair dismissal (including constructive dismissal), detriment for making protected disclosures about the fire exit shutters being down, direct sex discrimination, and harassment related to sex. The complaints arose principally from the Respondent's handling of abusive emails sent to her work address by her former partner, alleged comments by managers about that relationship, and the events surrounding a meeting on 21 December 2023 at which she said she was dismissed.
The Tribunal, sitting at Leeds before Employment Judge Singh with Ms G Fleming and Mr W Roberts, found that the Claimant was not dismissed on 21 December 2023 and that the events relied upon did not amount to a fundamental breach of the implied term of trust and confidence sufficient to ground constructive dismissal. On the protected disclosure complaint, the Tribunal found that the alleged detriments were not done on the ground of any protected disclosure. On the discrimination and harassment complaints, the Tribunal found either that the conduct alleged did not occur or, where it did, that a hypothetical male comparator would have been treated the same way and the conduct was not related to sex.
All substantive complaints were therefore dismissed as not well-founded. The victimisation claim and an earlier automatic unfair dismissal claim had previously been withdrawn by the Claimant. References in the judgment to £8,000 relate to a sum the Claimant requested from the Respondent in December 2023, not to any award; no remedy was ordered.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Includes constructive dismissal limb. Tribunal found the complaint of unfair dismissal (including constructive dismissal) was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Detriment for making a protected disclosure (ss.43A, 43B, 47B ERA) regarding the fire exit shutters. Tribunal found the complaint not well-founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination claim dismissed; tribunal found no less favourable treatment and that a hypothetical male comparator would have been treated the same. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to sex; tribunal found the conduct complained of either did not occur or was not related to sex. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation claim was pursued at the case management hearing but subsequently withdrawn by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 123 Equality Act 2010
- section 48 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 95 Employment Rights Act 1996
- sections 43A, 43B, 47B and 103A Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.