Case 1803034/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L McCann v Spicerhaart Group Services Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1803034/2020
- Decision date
- 21 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shore Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L McCann
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant, Miss L McCann, brought claims of breach of contract and for a protective award against Spicerhaart Group Services Limited. The hearing took place by telephone on 21 August 2020 before Employment Judge Shore.
The tribunal did not determine the claims on their merits. Instead, it recorded that both the breach of contract claim and the protective award claim were dismissed upon withdrawal. No substantive findings of fact, liability findings, or remedy award are set out in the judgment text supplied.
The decision therefore reflects a procedural disposal only. The published judgment does not identify any legal test applied or any monetary award made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the breach of contract claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The judgment states that the protective award claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.