Case 1803044/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Barry Moore v Sean Pong Tyres Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1803044/2021
- Decision date
- 7 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell
- Panel members
- Ms Jane Lee, Mr Michael Brewer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Barry Moore
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr Moore worked in a small tyre-grading operation run by Sean Pong Tyres Limited, alongside Mr Desmond Owusu and others, and that relations between Mr Moore and Mr Owusu deteriorated into repeated abusive exchanges. It accepted that Mr Owusu used abusive language, including age-related, race-related and occasionally sexual-orientation-related remarks, and found that Mr Moore was mainly on the receiving end rather than simply taking part in mutual banter. The tribunal also refused the respondent's late application to add Credential Environmental Limited as a party, applying the Selkent balance of prejudice approach and concluding that the amendment would have caused major delay and unfairness to Mr Moore.
The tribunal accepted that Mr Moore complained in writing on 10 January 2021, attended a meeting the following day, and then remained at work only for a short period before going off sick on 1 February 2021 and being signed off with depression on 3 February 2021. It found that the complaint was not properly resolved, that no effective action was taken, and that the later events culminated in Mr Moore's resignation with immediate effect on 19 April 2021. On those findings, and applying the implied duty of trust and confidence under Malik v BCCI and the statutory definition of dismissal in section 95(1)(c) ERA 1996, the tribunal held that he had been constructively dismissed.
The tribunal upheld direct discrimination and harassment on grounds of age and race, but not on grounds of sexual orientation. It accepted that the occasional use of the word 'gay' was a disparaging remark, but held that it was not enough on its own to satisfy the harassment threshold, and said that the main concerns were age and race. The unlawful deduction from wages claim was dismissed because the outstanding SSP sums had been paid. On remedy, the tribunal awarded a £1,710 basic award and a total unfair dismissal award of £7,486, and then assessed discrimination compensation under the Vento guidelines at £13,675 for injury to feelings plus £866.21 interest, giving a total award of £22,027.21.
Claims and outcomes
8 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal found that Mr Moore resigned in response to a breach of the implied term of trust and confidence arising from the workplace harassment. The final unfair-dismissal award stated by the tribunal was £7,486; the sub-totals in the remedy section are not fully arithmetically consistent, so the final figure is used here. | Upheld | — | £7,486 |
| Age discrimination | Direct discrimination on age grounds was upheld. The tribunal accepted repeated comments that Mr Moore was too old to do the job. | Upheld | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | Direct discrimination on race grounds was upheld. The tribunal accepted repeated race-related abuse and comments referring to Mr Moore as white. | Upheld | Race | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | The tribunal did not uphold the sexual-orientation discrimination complaint. It accepted that the word 'gay' was used as a disparaging remark, but not that this head was made out. | Dismissed | Sexual orientation | — |
| Harassment | Harassment on age grounds was upheld on the same pattern of abusive conduct. The tribunal found the conduct created a hostile and intimidating environment. | Upheld |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £22,027
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,710
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £5,776
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
9 references- s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996
- Malik v BCCI
- Selkent balance of prejudice
- Rule 2 overriding objective
- conduct extending over a period
- Vento v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police
- English v Thomas Sanderson Blinds Ltd
- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- ACAS Code of Practice on Discipline and Grievances
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.