Case 1803045/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Mr Bailey – Gibbs, a Solicitor — 2019
- Case reference
- 1803045/2019
- Decision date
- 1 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Neill Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Leeds on 31 July 2019 before Employment Judge O’Neill, the tribunal dealt with two claims brought by Mr A Ripley against First West Yorkshire Ltd. The harassment claim was brought contrary to section 26 of the Equality Act 2010, and the unlawful deduction of wages claim related to sick pay between 21 December 2018 and 13 January 2019.
Both claims were dismissed because the claimant withdrew them, and the respondent consented to the withdrawal. The written record states that the claims were dismissed on withdrawal. No liability findings on the merits and no monetary award were recorded in the judgment.
The judgment also notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of sending the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | Claim under section 26 Equality Act 2010. Dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant with the consent of the respondent. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim concerning sick pay from 21 December 2018 to 13 January 2019. Dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant with the consent of the respondent. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.