Case 1803064/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Elahi v Sky Subscriber Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1803064/2020
- Decision date
- 16 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Members
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Mr M Brewer, Mr G Harker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Elahi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Leeds on 2 to 6 August 2021 before Employment Judge Cox with members Mr M Brewer and Mr G Harker, the tribunal recorded that the reasonable adjustments claims in paragraphs 24.1 and 24.4 of the Grounds of Claim in case no. 1803064/2020 were dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. The direct disability discrimination claim in case no. 1806632/2020 was also dismissed on withdrawal. The remaining claims under the Equality Act 2010 failed and were dismissed.
The unfair dismissal claim succeeded. The tribunal ordered Sky Subscriber Services Ltd to pay the Claimant £22,735.35 in compensation for that dismissal. For the purposes of the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996, the tribunal recorded a monetary award of £22,735.35, a prescribed element of £21,495.24, a prescribed period from 10 August 2020 to 6 August 2021, and an excess over the prescribed element of £1,240.11.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claims of failure to meet the duty to make reasonable adjustments in paragraphs 24.1 and 24.4 of the Grounds of Claim in case no. 1803064/2020; dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination claim in case no. 1806632/2020; dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Other | The remaining claims under the Equality Act 2010 failed and were dismissed; the judgment does not identify them individually. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim succeeded and compensation of £22,735.35 was awarded. | Upheld | — | £22,735 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £22,735
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £22,735
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.