Case 1803373/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms B Zaccardelli v Star Academies — 2022
- Case reference
- 1803373/2021
- Decision date
- 9 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms B Zaccardelli
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Leeds by CVP before Employment Judge Maidment alone, held that Ms Zaccardelli was not dismissed by Star Academies. On that basis, her unfair dismissal claim failed and was dismissed. Her claim for damages for breach of contract failed for the same reason and was also dismissed.
The tribunal also dealt with a complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages. That complaint was dismissed upon the claimant's withdrawal of it. No monetary award was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was not dismissed by the respondent, so the unfair dismissal claim failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claimant sought damages for breach of contract, but because the tribunal found there had been no dismissal, that claim also failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal of it. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.