Case 1803537/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Mwangi A v Aston Hall Hotel Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1803537/2019
- Decision date
- 8 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Mr D Wilks OBE, Mr G Wareing
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Mwangi A
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal unanimously found that the claimant resigned because of a fundamental breach by the respondent and was constructively dismissed. It held that the dismissal was unfair and awarded a basic award of £1,421.53 and a compensatory award of £2,000, made up of £1,500 for lost earnings and £500 for loss of statutory rights.
On the race claims, the tribunal found harassment related to race over a period from December 2015 to May 2019. The harassment findings covered remarks about the colour of the claimant's hands, an October 2018 comparison by analogy with a fictional character, and a 5 April 2019 response by the General Manager when the claimant raised the possibility that actions taken against him were racially motivated. It held that the conduct extended over a period and was not out of time.
The tribunal dismissed the remaining direct race discrimination and harassment claims. It awarded £10,200 for harassment, having calculated £10,000 for injury to feelings and £1,333.33 interest before applying a 10% reduction for unreasonable failure to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Discipline and Grievance Procedures 2015. It also recorded that the recoupment provisions did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant resigned in response to a fundamental breach by the respondent and was constructively dismissed. It held the dismissal unfair and awarded a basic award of £1,421.53 and a compensatory award of £2,000. | Upheld | — | £3,422 |
| Harassment | The tribunal found harassment related to race over a period from December 2015 to May 2019, including remarks about the colour of the claimant's hands, an October 2018 comparison by analogy with a fictional character, and the 5 April 2019 response when he raised racial concerns. It held the conduct extended over a period and was not out of time. | Upheld | Race | £10,200 |
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,622
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,422
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,000
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.