Case 1803649/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J McHugh, counsel v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1803649/2021
- Decision date
- 13 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Panel members
- Mr M Lewis, Mr K Lannaman
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr J McHugh, counsel
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard in Leeds on 6 to 10 and 11 February 2023 before Employment Judge JM Wade with Mr M Lewis and Mr K Lannaman as the lay members. The tribunal's judgment was unanimous and, on 13 February 2023, it dismissed the claimant's remaining disability complaints.
The judgment records that the claimant's Equality Act harassment complaint and the complaint in relation to holiday pay were dismissed because they had been withdrawn on 22 November 2022. The written judgment does not set out any remedy because none was awarded.
The tribunal also dismissed the claimant's complaints of a failure to make reasonable adjustments, discrimination arising from disability, and victimisation. The reasons were provided at the time of the hearing, and the judgment notes that written reasons were requested and would follow in due course.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The judgment records that this Equality Act harassment complaint was dismissed having been withdrawn on 22 November 2022. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records that the holiday pay complaint was dismissed having been withdrawn on 22 November 2022. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | This entry covers the claimant's complaints of a failure to make reasonable adjustments and discrimination arising from disability, both of which were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | The tribunal unanimously dismissed the victimisation complaint. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.